ESG appeared as a globally trending issue, impacting the decisions of many investors. With the urgency to address environmental problems, many companies have been pushed to embrace sustainability and portray themselves as environmentally responsible. However, not all that glitter is green. Behind the glossy facade of sustainable claims lies a sinister phenomenon known as “greenwashing”. So, what is “greenwashing” and what are the problems associated with it? All will be answered in a 3-part blog series about this topic.
1. Defining greenwashing
Greenwashing is a deceptive marketing or public relations strategy used by companies to create a false or misleading impression that their products, services, or overall business practices are environmentally friendly or socially responsible when, in reality, they are not. It's a form of dishonesty aimed at capitalizing on the growing consumer and investor interest in sustainability and ethical practices.
2. Uncover greenwashing in corporate activities
Vague or irrelevant language: Greenwashing often relies on ambiguous terms like "eco-friendly," "all-natural," or "green" without providing concrete evidence or transparent information to support these claims. This deliberate ambiguity allows companies to mislead consumers. For example, brands like H&M and Zara were criticized for promoting small green initiatives while contributing to textile waste and using misleading marketing terms like "sustainable" and "green" without clear definitions.
Exaggerated claims: Some companies might exaggerate the environmental benefits of their products. Examples of irrelevant claims include suggesting something is biodegradable but it still takes decades to biodegrade. Or, claiming it's free from certain chemicals yet still includes countless others that are considered harmful.
Lack of third-party certification: Trustworthy environmental certifications from reputable third-party organizations can be a good sign. If a company says they are committed to sustainability, they should have clear and measurable goals and actions that demonstrate their progress. If you cannot find any evidence or the evidence is vague, incomplete, or outdated, you should be skeptical of their claims.
Deceptive imagery: happens when companies use natural imagery, like leaves or animals, to imply their products benefit the planet. Packaging might also look natural, free of bold printing and colors, suggesting that products are organic.
Hidden trade-offs: A product that emphasizes one green attribute but ignores other important environmental issues is suspect. For example, a product might be made from recycled materials but manufactured in a way that produces a lot of pollution.
3. Real Cases of Greenwashing Worldwide
Volkswagen: In 2015, Volkswagen was fined $14 billion for emissions cheating. The company marketed their vehicles as environmentally friendly, but in a sneaky trick, they installed software that cheated emissions tests. This "defeat device" only activated during testing, making the cars appear cleaner than they truly were. In reality, these so-called eco-friendly vehicles were polluting the air at alarming rates, exceeding legal limits by up to 40 times.
ExxonMobil: ExxonMobil, a major oil company, has a history of environmental harm. This includes the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill, one of the worst in US history, that devastated Alaska's coastline. In 2022, American oil and gas giant ExxonMobil was criticized for advertising that suggested their experimental algae biofuel could one day reduce transportation emissions, while ExxonMobil has no goal of reaching net-zero emissions across the entire corporation and its 2025 emissions reduction targets do not include the vast majority of emissions from their products.
Coca-Cola: Coca-Cola, the world's largest beverage company, is under fire for its excessive use of plastic bottles, which has contributed significantly to environmental pollution. Despite the company's claims of implementing measures to collect and recycle plastic bottles, environmental organizations argue that these efforts are insufficient and merely a form of "greenwashing." A lawsuit filed in 2021 accusing Coca-Cola of misrepresenting its environmental impact has further raised doubts about the sincerity of its sustainability commitments.
Starbucks: In 2018, Starbucks made headlines with the introduction of its "strawless lid" as part of its sustainability initiative. However, instead of being met with applause, the initiative sparked controversy when it was revealed that the new lid used more plastic than the previous combination of lid and straw. Starbucks acknowledged this but also emphasized that the new lid was made from polypropylene, a widely accepted recyclable plastic that "can be collected in recycling streams." However, critics quickly pointed out that only 9% of plastic worldwide is recycled, and that changing the lid without addressing the root issue of plastic waste was merely an act of "greenwashing." They called on Starbucks to make more genuine efforts to reduce plastic use in its operations, rather than just focusing on symbolic changes.
Greenwashing, the deceptive practice of misleading consumers about a company's or product's environmental sustainability, is not just a marketing ploy; it's a strategy that carries serious repercussions for consumers, businesses, and the environment.
Impacts on Consumers: Consumers are misled into believing that businesses are making meaningful changes for the environment when in reality they often are not. This erodes trust in genuine sustainability efforts by other businesses and breeds skepticism among consumers towards sustainability as a whole. Additionally, when sustainability information is distorted, consumers struggle to make informed purchasing decisions, diminishing their ability to contribute positively to the environment.
Impact on brands: Greenwashing can lead to a loss of customer trust, negatively impacting a company's reputation and sales. Instead of focusing on genuine environmental improvements, greenwashing companies prioritize superficial changes, hindering their potential for growth and innovation.
Impact on the environment: Greenwashing obscures genuine environmental issues, making them harder to address and hindering progress towards sustainable development. Greenwashing companies may waste resources on activities that do not benefit the environment, rather than investing in true solutions.
Stay tuned to unveil the dirty tricks of greenwashing in finance and its consequences for global giants!
Comments